These two are not in the same weight class, and the honest comparison starts there. Dermaplaning is surface exfoliation with a blade. Microneedling is a controlled injury to the living layer beneath.
Dermaplaning scrapes away dead cells from the very top of the skin, along with the fine vellus hair. It does not enter the dermis, so it does not set off the wound-healing response that produces new collagen. Nothing about that makes it a bad treatment - it just is not a collagen treatment.
Microneedling drives fine needles up to about 2.5 mm into the skin. The channels trigger fibroblast activity, new collagen and elastin remodelling. SkinPen, the device that created the category through a De Novo authorisation in March 2018, is authorised to improve the appearance of facial acne scars in all skin types and neck wrinkles in Fitzpatrick II-IV.
So they change different things. Dermaplaning changes how the surface looks and feels today. Microneedling attempts to change the structure underneath over months. One is a finish; the other is a course of treatment.
It is a manual technique, not a device with an FDA cosmetic indication attached to it.
A regulated device category - 21 CFR 878.4430, product code QAI - created by SkinPen's De Novo, DEN160029.
Nothing is injured and nothing is stimulated. The effect is subtraction.
No energy source is involved; the entire effect is mechanical trauma plus the body's repair response.
It does not reach the dermis.
SkinPen's needle protrusion is adjustable from 0 to 2.5 mm; its pivotal study used a 2.5 mm maximum.
It does what it does well. It just does not build collagen.
It does not tighten lax skin and does not reach or heat fat, so it has no contouring effect.
Dermaplaning is a technique performed with a blade, not a cleared aesthetic device, so the usual regulatory comparison does not apply. There is very little published research on dermaplaning. What follows describes the technique and its mechanism; it is not drawn from trials, and no clinical figure for dermaplaning is quoted anywhere on this page.
That is SkinPen's exact wording (K202243, April 2021). Dermapen 4's clearance covers facial acne scars in Fitzpatrick I-V and has no neck indication.
Some redness or sensitivity for a short time afterwards.
Mild swelling and pinpoint bleeding on the day. Clinical convention, not a labelled figure.
It is a top-up, not a course with an endpoint.
Clinical convention, not a labelled figure.
Dermaplaning can make skin feel smoother, remove vellus hair, and let makeup sit flatter. It cannot remodel a scar, soften a line that lives in the dermis, or tighten anything, because it never reaches the tissue where those things happen.
Microneedling can improve atrophic acne scars and texture - a network meta-analysis of 24 randomised trials in 1,546 people found microneedling performs better when combined with another treatment such as a chemical peel than it does alone (Li 2024). It cannot meaningfully tighten lax skin, and it will not give you a smoother surface on the day; the first few days are the opposite.
Dermaplaning is quick, needs no consumable beyond a blade, and requires no recovery, so it sits at the low end of clinic pricing. Microneedling is a longer appointment, uses a single-use sterile needle cartridge, and is sold as a course rather than a single visit.
There is no reliable published price for either treatment, so treat any number you are quoted as that clinic's price in that market, not as an average.
Microneedling opens thousands of channels in the skin. Dermaplaning does not, which is why the precautions below apply mainly to one side of this comparison.