← Radiesse

Radiesse for Jowls

Written & medically reviewed by the Dermapedia team
At a Glance

Radiesse is not approved for jowls. It is approved for the jawline, which is a different thing. On 1 September 2021 the FDA approved Radiesse (+) Lidocaine for "deep injection (subdermal and/or supraperiosteal) for soft tissue augmentation to improve moderate to severe loss of jawline contour in adults over the age of 21." The word "jowls" appears in no Radiesse approval.

That distinction is the whole page. Building the jawline is adding structure along the bone. A jowl is soft tissue that has descended past the jawline. Adding volume above and behind a jowl can make the jaw read as a cleaner line — but no filler lifts skin that has become lax. That is not a limitation of Radiesse specifically; it is what injecting volume does and does not do.

Off-label use is legal and routine, and injecting Radiesse into the jowl area is off-label. Flagging that is not a criticism of anyone. It tells you that the trial the FDA reviewed measured jawline contour on a jawline scale, not jowl correction.

Radiesse cannot be reversed. Hyaluronidase dissolves hyaluronic acid fillers and does nothing to calcium hydroxylapatite. No reversal agent for it is approved. Along the jaw, where the result is in profile and visible from every angle, that is worth sitting with before you book.

Other products carry jaw-related approvals too, and they are not the same as each other. Juvederm Volux XC has held a US indication for jawline definition since 2022. It is a hyaluronic acid gel, so it can be dissolved. Neither product is approved for jowls.

Key Facts

ProductRadiesse (+) Lidocaine, calcium hydroxylapatite in a gel carrier, made by Merz
Jawline approvalPMA supplement P050052/S129, 1 September 2021, Panel Track
Approved wordingDeep injection, subdermal and/or supraperiosteal, for soft tissue augmentation to improve moderate to severe loss of jawline contour in adults over the age of 21
JowlsNot named in any Radiesse approval, and no trial of Radiesse for jowls has been published
Jawline trial result75.6% responders at week 12 versus 8.8% in the control group
Durability in that trialAbout 67.3% of initial responders still had treatment success at week 48; the study ran to week 60
Most common side effect in that trialInjection-site mass in 10.9%, then bruising 6.9% and pain 6.9%
Skin types in that trialFitzpatrick I to III 60.6%, IV to VI 39.4% — the most diverse of the Radiesse pivotal trials
ReversibleNo. Hyaluronidase has no effect on calcium hydroxylapatite and no reversal agent is approved
Other jaw-related approvalJuvederm Volux XC, approved 29 July 2022 for improvement of jawline definition; a hyaluronic acid gel, and reversible
What filler does not doTighten or lift lax skin; no Radiesse indication or trial endpoint mentions lifting

What is approved, and what it says

Radiesse works in two stages: a carrier gel that adds volume the same day, then calcium hydroxylapatite particles left behind as a scaffold that the body builds collagen around. It is a mineral suspension, not a hyaluronic acid gel — and that difference decides what can be done later if the result is wrong.

Its US approvals are area by area, because fillers go through the FDA's premarket approval route, which requires clinical evidence for a named cosmetic indication in a named place.

The one that matters here is supplement P050052/S129, approved 1 September 2021, a Panel Track supplement — the most demanding category, requiring new clinical data. The indication reads:

"RADIESSE (+) Lidocaine injectable implant is indicated for deep injection (subdermal and/or supraperiosteal) for soft tissue augmentation to improve moderate to severe loss of jawline contour in adults over the age of 21."

Read what that sentence contains and what it does not. It names jawline contour. It specifies deep placement, against or near the bone. It says soft tissue augmentation — adding volume. It does not say jowls, and it does not say lifting, tightening or laxity.

Radiesse's other named areas are facial wrinkles and folds such as nasolabial folds (2006), facial fat loss in people with HIV (2006), the backs of the hands (2015), and the décolleté at a 1:2 dilution (2026).

Jawline is not jowls

A jowl is soft tissue — fat and skin — that has slipped downward past the jaw margin, so the clean line of the jaw is interrupted by a bulge in front of it. Loss of jawline contour is a different observation: the bony framework and the tissue over it have flattened, so there is no crisp border between face and neck.

They often occur together, and the same face can have both. They are not the same problem and they do not have the same solution.

Filler placed deep along the mandible restores projection to the jaw line itself. Placed in front of and above a jowl, it can blunt the step-off so the eye reads a straighter line. What it does not do is lift the tissue that has descended. Nothing in the Radiesse label, and nothing in the endpoint of its jawline trial, involves lifting, tightening or repositioning tissue. The trial measured contour on a jawline scale.

Where a jowl is mostly loose skin, adding volume can make it heavier rather than better: That is the honest limit, and the reason a consultation should start by working out which of the two problems predominates. Treatments aimed at lax skin and descent — energy devices, threads, surgery — belong to a different category with their own evidence and their own risks.

Injecting Radiesse into the jowl itself is off-label. That is legal and routine, and it is not a mark against the injector. It is simply the reason there is no trial to quote for it.

What the jawline trial found

The evidence the FDA reviewed for the 2021 approval is the strongest Radiesse data in this region, and it is worth knowing exactly what it showed.

**Primary endpoint at week 12: 75.6% responders, against 8.8% in the control group.**

At week 48, roughly 67.3% of the initial responders still met the definition of treatment success.

The study's final timepoint was week 60.

The most common treatment-related side effect was injection-site mass in 10.9%, followed by bruising and pain at 6.9% each. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events. One person had severe swelling lasting 16 days.

Skin types: Fitzpatrick I to III 60.6%, IV to VI 39.4% — the most skin-tone-diverse of the Radiesse pivotal trials, which is worth noting because most filler trials are heavily skewed to lighter skin.

The sponsor was Merz North America, which makes Radiesse. Registration trials are almost always run by the manufacturer; that does not invalidate them, but it belongs in the same sentence as the numbers.

There is no equivalent trial for jowls: The one published study that measured jowl volume after Radiesse used hyperdilute product across the mid and lower face and found reduced jowl volume on 3D imaging at day 150 (p<0.0001) in 22 charts - a retrospective review with no control group, graded Level of Evidence 4 by its own authors, from an author group with Merz ties, at a dilution that is not part of any approved labelling.

Merz markets Radiesse (+) as the "first and only aesthetic injectable to improve moderate to severe loss of jawline contour." That is the manufacturer's claim about its own indication wording, and it should be read as one.

Radiesse is not reversible, and that matters along the jaw

Hyaluronic acid fillers can be broken down with hyaluronidase. Radiesse cannot. The enzyme has no chemical target in calcium hydroxylapatite microspheres or in the cellulose gel that carries them. There is no approved reversal agent for it, its label names none, and a 2026 review of the material lists the absence of one as a known limitation.

Sodium thiosulfate is sometimes named as a solution. It is not an established reversal agent for Radiesse; the published evidence for and against it is set out on the page about whether Radiesse is permanent.

If a jawline result is too heavy, too wide or asymmetric, the realistic options are time, saline injection with mechanical disruption through a cannula for a discrete nodule, intralesional steroid for an inflammatory lump, and rarely surgery. The label states that safety beyond 3 years in the face has not been investigated — a study window, not a lifespan.

Compare that with Juvederm Volux XC, approved on 29 July 2022 for "improvement of jawline definition in adults over the age of 21 with moderate to severe loss of jawline definition." It is a hyaluronic acid gel, so it can be dissolved. Its trial reported 69.9% responders at month 6 against 39.1% in the delayed-treatment control group — and that control figure is worth noticing, because a 39.1% "response" in people who received nothing tells you how soft these scales can be. Volux is not approved for jowls either, and the two products' separate trials cannot be used to say one outperformed the other.

Questions worth asking at a consultation:

Is my problem loss of jaw definition, descended tissue, or both — and in what proportion?

If it is mostly loose skin, is filler the right category of treatment at all?

Where exactly are you placing product, and how much?

Why Radiesse rather than a filler that could be dissolved if I dislike it?

What happens if the result looks heavy from the side?

Get emergency help now

Go to an emergency department or call 911 for any of these, during or after the appointment. They can indicate filler in a blood vessel, and time matters in hours.

Any change in vision — blurring, a dark area, double vision or loss of sight in either eye

Sudden severe pain, or pain out of proportion to the procedure

Skin turning white or pale (blanching), then dusky, purple or mottled

Weakness, facial droop, slurred speech or any other stroke-like symptom

Call your injector if

Swelling is still increasing after the first few days rather than settling

A firm lump forms and does not settle, or one appears weeks or months later

Redness spreads out from the injection site, or the area becomes warm and tender

Tenderness or swelling appears weeks after treatment, which can indicate a delayed inflammatory reaction or an infection

The contour looks like it has moved or become uneven

Questions people ask

+
Is Radiesse FDA-approved for jowls?No. Radiesse (+) Lidocaine holds a 2021 approval for improving moderate to severe loss of jawline contour. Jowls are not named in that indication or in any other Radiesse approval, and no trial of Radiesse for jowls has been published. Injecting it into the jowl area is off-label, which is legal and routine.
Will filler lift my jowls?No filler lifts lax skin. Adding volume along the jaw and above the jowl can make the jawline read as a straighter line, which changes how the area looks. It does not reposition tissue that has descended. Where a jowl is mostly loose skin rather than lost structure, adding volume can make it look heavier.
What is the difference between jawline and jowls?A jowl is soft tissue that has slipped below the jaw margin. Loss of jawline contour is flattening of the jaw's own border. Many people have both, but they are different problems, and only the second one is what the Radiesse trial measured.
How long do the jawline results last?In the trial behind the approval, 75.6% of treated people were responders at week 12, and about 67.3% of those initial responders still met the success definition at week 48. The study's last timepoint was week 60. The label makes no duration claim at all and states that safety beyond 3 years in the face has not been investigated.
Can Radiesse be dissolved if the jawline looks too heavy?No. Hyaluronidase works only on hyaluronic acid and has no effect on calcium hydroxylapatite. No reversal agent is approved. Options are waiting, saline injection with mechanical disruption for a nodule, steroid injection for an inflammatory lump, and rarely surgery.
Are there other fillers approved for this area?Juvederm Volux XC has been approved for improvement of jawline definition since July 2022. It is a hyaluronic acid product and can be dissolved. It is not approved for jowls either. Their separate trials cannot be compared to say one works better than the other.
How common are lumps along the jaw?In the jawline trial, injection-site mass was reported in 10.9% of treated people — the most common treatment-related event. Bruising and pain were each 6.9%. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events.
What is the most serious risk?Filler entering an artery, which can cause tissue death or, if material reaches the circulation supplying the eye, vision loss. It is rare and it is an emergency. With Radiesse there is no enzyme that can be injected to break the material down.

References

+
US Food and Drug Administration. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data, PMA P050052/S129, RADIESSE (+) Lidocaine, jawline contour, approved 1 September 2021. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf5/P050052S129B.pdf
The verbatim jawline indication, the week-12 responder rate of 75.6% versus 8.8%, retention of about 67.3% of initial responders at week 48, the week-60 endpoint, injection-site mass at 10.9%, and the Fitzpatrick distribution.
US Food and Drug Administration. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data, PMA P050052, RADIESSE Injectable Implant, approved 22 December 2006. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf5/p050052b.pdf
The original facial wrinkles and folds indication and its split-face pivotal trial in 117 subjects.
US Food and Drug Administration. Labelling, PMA P050052/S162D, RADIESSE Injectable Implant. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf5/P050052S162D.pdf
The current combined indications block and the statement that safety beyond 3 years in the face has not been investigated.
US Food and Drug Administration. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data, PMA P110033/S065, JUVEDERM VOLUX XC, approved 29 July 2022. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf11/P110033S065B.pdf
The jawline definition indication wording and the pivotal trial: 69.9% responders at month 6 against 39.1% in the delayed-treatment control group.
Durairaj KK, et al. Hyperdilute calcium hydroxylapatite for the mid and lower face. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2025;7:ojaf104. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41376672/
Retrospective chart review of 22 patients treated with 1:3 hyperdilute CaHA; 3D imaging at day 150 showed reduced jowl volume (p<0.0001). No control group, Level of Evidence 4, author group with Merz ties, and a dilution outside approved labelling.
Huang, Ma, Guo. Calcium hydroxylapatite in aesthetic and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42175763/
Review of how CaHA works through 2025, and the source for the absence of a reversal agent being named as a limitation.
Danysz W, Nowag B, Hengl T, Kreymerman P, Furne C, Madeuf E, Höennscheidt C, Mraz Robinson D. Can sodium thiosulfate act as a reversal agent for calcium hydroxylapatite filler? Results of a preclinical study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020;13:1059-73. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33408497/
In vitro and live-pig study finding no CaHA degradation by sodium thiosulfate, with necrosis and haemorrhage observed. Authors are Merz R&D and Merz North America staff — the manufacturer of the product tested.
Robinson DM. In vitro analysis of the degradation of calcium hydroxylapatite dermal filler: a proof-of-concept study. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44 Suppl 1:S5-S9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30358629/
The supportive side of the sodium thiosulfate question: 12 cadaveric porcine skin samples, 24-hour biopsy, proof of concept only.
Emer J, Sundaram H. Aesthetic applications of calcium hydroxylapatite volumizing filler: an evidence-based review and discussion of current concepts. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12(12):1345-54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24301235/
Describes immediate volume replacement for up to 12 months and states that CaHA is adjustable but not reversible, while HA is fully reversible with hyaluronidase.
Doyon VC, Liu C, Fitzgerald R, et al. Update on blindness from filler: review of prognostic factors, management approaches, and a century of published cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2024;44(10):1091-1104. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38630871/
511 published cases since 1906; of 318 with a recorded outcome, 6.0% recovered completely and 68.2% did not recover. A case-count with no denominator, so it cannot give a rate.
Merz Aesthetics. Merz Aesthetics launches RADIESSE (+) as first and only aesthetic injectable to improve moderate to severe loss of jawline contour, 1 February 2022. https://merzaesthetics.com/news/merz-aesthetics-launches-radiesse-as-first-and-only-aesthetic-injectable-to-improve-moderate-to-severe-loss-of-jawline-contour/
The manufacturer's own launch claim, quoted here as a manufacturer statement rather than as an independent finding.
US Food and Drug Administration. Dermal fillers (soft tissue fillers). https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/aesthetic-cosmetic-devices/dermal-fillers-soft-tissue-fillers
FDA's risk list for fillers, including the statement that side effects may appear weeks, months or years after injection.
← Back to Radiesse