Comparison

Ultraformer vs Ultherapy

Both focus ultrasound deep to lift skin. Ultherapy has more research and more pain. Ultraformer is faster and cheaper. How to choose between them.
Written & medically reviewed by the Dermapedia team
At a Glance

These are two machines doing the same job. Both focus ultrasound to make heat several millimetres under the skin, so your body rebuilds collagen there. Ultherapy is the original and has the longer published record. It is slower, more painful and usually dearer. Ultraformer is quicker, easier to sit through and cheaper, with more depth settings and much less published evidence. No trial has compared them directly.

Ultraformer
Also called Ultraformer III, Ultraformer MPT, HIFU
Ultherapy
Also called Ulthera, Ultherapy Prime, microfocused ultrasound
Ultraformer sends focused ultrasound to set depths. The handpiece is moved in lines.
Ultherapy uses focused ultrasound. The handpiece is moved along the jawline and neck in lines.

What it is

Focused ultrasound, several cartridges

A Korean-made HIFU device. Different cartridges set different depths, so one session can treat several layers.

Focused ultrasound, imaged as it goes

The first machine of its kind. The operator sees the tissue on a screen and places the energy in the layer they are aiming at.

How deep it goes

Shallow to deep, cartridge by cartridge

Commonly 1.5, 2, 3 and 4.5 mm, with a body cartridge for deeper work.

Usually three depths on the face

About 1.5, 3 and 4.5 mm. The deepest reaches the layer below the fat that supports the lower face.

What you should see

Firmer skin and a tidier jaw edge

The same aims: a cleaner jawline, a firmer neck, a slightly lifted brow.

Some lift along the jaw and neck

The lift claim rests on more published work than any other machine in this category.

What it will not do

It does nothing for surface texture
It does nothing for surface texture
Both
Focused ultrasound skips the top of the skin on purpose. Pores, rough texture and acne scars are untouched, and neither one removes loose skin.

What it feels like

Warm, with quick prickles

Energy is delivered in smaller, faster pulses, which most people find easier. Numbing cream is usual.

Sharp, deep pulses of heat

Bigger pulses at each point. Many clinics add oral pain medicine, and some people rate it the most painful treatment they have had.

How long it takes

Around 20 to 30 minutes for a face
Around 60 to 90 minutes for a face
Both
A shorter session is not automatically a lighter one. Ask how many lines of energy are planned, because that is what drives the result.

How long until it works

Two to three months

Some tightening in the first weeks, then a slow build.

Two to three months

Occasionally a small lift on the day, but the real change is the collagen.

How long it lasts

About a year
About a year, sometimes longer
Both
Both are averages. Age, skin quality, sun and smoking all move the number, and most people repeat every one to two years.

Downtime

None

Pinkness and mild tenderness for a day or so.

None, but you may be sore

Swelling and tenderness for a few days. Patchy numbness along the jaw can last a week or two.

Cost

Usually the cheaper of the two
Usually the dearer of the two
Both
With either, ask which areas the quote covers and how many lines are included. A cheap quote with half the energy is not a bargain.

The at-home or drugstore version

There is not one

Home ultrasound wands do not focus. They spread a fraction of the power across the surface.

There is not one

The gap is the same. Nothing sold for home use heats tissue several millimetres down, and a device that could would not be safe untrained.

Who each suits

Best for
Someone who wants the same idea with a shorter, gentler session and a lower price.
The trade-off
Less published evidence, and quality varies with the clinic and the cartridges used.
Best for
Someone who wants the machine with the deepest track record for lift.
The trade-off
A rough hour or more, and a higher price.
Clinician moving an Ultraformer handpiece along a person's cheek.
Ultraformer sends focused ultrasound to set depths. The handpiece is moved in lines.
Clinician moving an Ultherapy handpiece along a person's cheek.
Ultherapy uses focused ultrasound. The handpiece is moved along the jawline and neck in lines.

They work the same way

Both focus ultrasound to a point below the skin: Everything above the focus is left alone. At the focus, the tissue reaches a temperature that makes it contract, and the repair that follows lays down new collagen over the next few months.

Both aim at the deep layer for lift: That is the fibrous sheet beneath the fat which a surgeon tightens in a facelift. Reaching it is why either treatment can claim lift rather than firmness alone.

Neither one breaks the skin: That is why there is nothing to hide afterwards with either.

The differences that actually matter

Ultherapy shows the operator what they are treating: Its screen displays the tissue layers, so the energy can be placed rather than assumed. That is the clearest technical difference between the two.

Ultraformer offers more depth settings in one session: Swapping cartridges lets an operator treat shallow and deep layers in the same appointment.

Ultraformer is faster and easier to sit through: Smaller, quicker pulses mean less pain per point, and a full face is often done in well under half the time.

Ultherapy has far more published research: Ultraformer studies exist but are fewer and smaller. That gap is about evidence, not proof that one works better.

Availability shapes the choice more than anything

Ultherapy is the machine most US clinics own: If you are in the United States, that may be the only one you are offered.

Ultraformer is widely used in Asia, Australia, the Middle East and parts of Europe: In those markets it is often the cheaper default, and Ultherapy is the premium option.

So the real decision is usually local: Compare the clinic and the operator in front of you, not the two brand names in the abstract.

The risks worth knowing

Both are low risk in trained hands: Redness, swelling and tenderness are common with either and settle within days.

Both carry the same small risks from working deep: Temporary numbness or tingling along the jaw is the usual version. Rarely a nerve is irritated enough to cause a few weeks of weakness or a drooping lip, and it recovers.

A very slim face is the one to flag: Deep heating affects fat as well, and in a face with little to spare that can leave a hollow look. Say so if you are naturally very thin.

Before you book

Ask which machine it is, and ask to see it. "HIFU" on a price list tells you nothing.

Ask how many lines of energy are planned for each area, and get the number in writing.

Ask what pain relief is offered, and say how much you are willing to accept.

Ask to see the clinic's own before-and-after photos, taken in the same light and at the same angle.

Related

Questions people ask

+
Is Ultraformer as good as Ultherapy?
Nobody has tested them against each other. They use the same principle and aim at the same depths, but Ultherapy has far more published research behind it and Ultraformer has far less.
Which one hurts less?
Ultraformer, for most people. It delivers energy in smaller, faster pulses, so each point is less intense. Ultherapy uses bigger pulses and many clinics offer oral pain medicine with it.
Why is Ultraformer cheaper?
The machine and its cartridges cost the clinic less, and sessions are shorter. In markets where both are sold, Ultherapy is usually positioned as the premium option.
Does Ultherapy really show the tissue on a screen?
Yes. The system displays the layers as the operator works, so energy can be placed in the intended layer. Ultraformer does not have that imaging.
How long do the results last?
Roughly a year with either, sometimes longer. Most people who like the result repeat it every one to two years, because ageing continues either way.
Can either replace a facelift?
No. Both give a modest lift at best. If you can pinch a fold of skin along your jaw and lift it, surgery is the honest comparison.